Occupy Volume, Occupy Verticality

#Occupy. Where does it go from here? How ‘bout up? I’m not 100% serious, but it’s been fascinating to see how #Occupy has expanded occupation to mean more than parking our collective butts on a flat—or at least, horizontal—and usually (so far) outdoor surface. We geographers like to hammer on about how social spaces are so damn hypercomplex, but serious examination of spatiality often sidesteps the volumetric, the aerial, the vertical, the subterranean, and the ever finicky hydrological—particularly, when it comes to the sea. Lucky for us, these sometimes-overlooked aspects of spatiality have been subject to increasingly critical scrutiny by the geographically inclined. What makes volume, the aerial, and the vertical such powerful vehicles of protest is that they jarringly dethrone common sense understandings of space as two-dimensional and material. Continue reading

Posted in #Occupy, City, Everyday Life, Henri Lefebvre, Insurgency/Counterinsurgency, Power, Spatiality, The State, Violence | 6 Comments

#Occupy Poster Art

Besides being a personal obsession of mine, poster art has a long history in radical movements for social change. I’m particularly interested in how images and art are able to communicate AND generate solidarity across social and geographical divides. One of my favorite compilations of revolutionary poster art is the collection compiled by Lincoln Cushing, a Havana-born librarian and archivist, titled ¡Revolución! Cuban Poster Art. I particularly like the portion of the book that focuses on the posters—I include some I grabbed online in the gallery below—produced by the Organization in Solidarity with the People of Africa, Asia and Latin America (OSPAAAL). Cushing has also has published other beautiful (and very affordable) collections: Visions of Peace & Justice: 30 Years of Political Posters from the Archives of Inkworks Press (2007); Chinese Posters: Art from the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (2007); Agitate! Educate! Organize! – American Labor Posters (2009). Continue reading

Posted in #Occupy, Art, Networks | 4 Comments

Occupy on Fiber Optics

It’s been difficult to keep up with events in recent days. Enter haggard movie voice: “It’s all happened so faaast!” Of course, it’s still happening. It’s also been hard to keep up with all the great analysis, writing, and ideas flooding the fiber optics. A few have caught my attention in recent days.

Occupy is implicitly a movement in which spatiality figures centrally. Appropriately, then, the journal Society and Space has opened an interesting forum on the movement, with many stellar contributions. But Ananya Roy makes the argument that the movement’s temporal dimensions—particularly its staking a claim on the future—is perhaps more instructive than its spatiality. With a hat-tip to yours truly, Stuart Elden explores the politics of the Guy Fawkes mask rebranding it “V for Visibility.” Eduardo Mendieta, meanwhile, reveals the praxis embedded in “occupy” itself as a word, a concept, and an action. Check out the many other provocative contributions and a few links to other related writings.

The Rag Blog chimed in with “Ten Immodest Commandments” for Occupy courtesy of Mike Davis—self-proclaimed “old fart” (his words, not mine)—who offers invaluable advice. I particularly liked his call for reinvigorating the additional move from Occupy Wall Street to Occupy Main Street—e.g. Dayton, Cheyenne, Omaha, and El Paso. He also makes the related argument that union participation in Occupy is “mutually transformative,” suggesting that “anti-capitalist protesters thus need to more effectively hook up with rank-and-file opposition groups and progressive caucuses within the unions.” And as far as demands, he notes that eventually we’ll have to formulate “demands [that] have the broadest appeal while remaining radical in an anti-systemic sense.”

Upcoming post: Occupy Verticality, Occupy as Volume

Posted in #Occupy, City, Everyday Life, Spatiality | 4 Comments

More Stencil! #Occupy

Checking out the recent post over at Place Hacker, which conveniently had a Guy Fawkes image as stencil-ready, I got some new protest art ideas. Both Mashups. (Click on images below for larger size.) More stencil here. Proliferate! Continue reading

Posted in #Occupy, Everyday Life | 2 Comments

The Mask of ‘Anarchy’

An article by Jonathan Jones in the Guardian has been making the rounds and offers some interesting commentary on the proliferation of the V for Vendetta mask at recent #Occupy protests. Coming on the heels of the Oakland General Strike, the piece got me thinking about a few things: other histories and examples of masked protest, the role of clandestine or anonymous activism, violence, and the destruction of property. Considering the name of this blog, I couldn’t pass up the chance to share some really scattered thoughts about these political masquerades. Continue reading

Posted in #Occupy, Bandits, City, Everyday Life, Insurgency/Counterinsurgency, Law, Networks, Pirates, Power, Spectacle, The State, Violence | 5 Comments

Occupy Oakland Photo Slideshow

[scrollGallery id=4]

Posted in #Occupy, City, Everyday Life, Power | Comments Off on Occupy Oakland Photo Slideshow

¡General Strike! Oakland Walks

Today. A General Strike. Oakland will become liberated territory. I will be in Oakland with many many people. I read a great post this morning on what a “General Strike” actually means. The post draws on Walter Benjamin and Rosa Luxemburg and makes plainly evident why the General Strike is a perfect form of “pure means” for #Occupy in light of the movement’s demands.

Demands: What demands? As we’ve said, “Our only demand is that you join us.” But actually, the Occupations around the world have a million demands. So many demands, in fact, that they don’t become “demands” at all, and this is what, to this point, has kept the momentum in our favor and guarded against co-optation. Having so many demands that you “don’t have any” means that #Occupy can be a space of convergence for a multitude of people and groups. This fluidity of motion is what movements are all about. As Raúl Zibechi writes, “What are social movements about, if not precisely that? Movement.”

Organizing: This does NOT mean that there is no organizing. I have one comrade who will not shut up about how stupid the protests are because of how little actual community (door-to-door) organizing they’re doing; unless this happens, says my friend, the Occupations are a waste of time. I disagree. Oakland is an interesting case because local community groups that are ALREADY organized have been actively participating. It’s also worth asking: How many community organizers do you think #Occupy has actually produced and/or radicalized? Two, three, muchos? I’d venture on the muchos.

Many of my friends spent the entire week since the General Strike was called doing exactly this type of door-to-door pavement work.  My friend who works in China woke up at 5am yesterday and went to Oakland’s China Town to do exactly what my other friend says is not happening. Posters and flyers were made in Mandarin and Spanish, and people have been hitting the streets in these communities all week (and not only this week). Yes, social movements are about movement. The post mentioned above has interesting things to say about spontaneity. I have this to say to my grouchy friend: #Occupy is a qualitatively different animal from, say, the Anti-Nukes movement, which occupied Wall St. in 1979. This isn’t and can’t be a singly-oriented movement, so it can’t be organized that way.

Honestly, I’m not sure what “organizing” would look like, other than the organization of accumulated historical-geographical connections. None of what’s happening in Oakland would look the way it does without the mobilizations that occurred when Oscar Grant was shot by police. It wouldn’t look the way it does without the decades of organizing in California against police brutality, against the prison system, and what these contemporary movements have to with other “Black, Brown, Yellow and Left” radical groups from the ’60s. Today’s General Strike would not look the way it does without the Budget Cut protests and organizing that’s been going on for a few years now, particularly at UC Berkeley. It wouldn’t look the way it does without Lower Manhattan, without London “Riots,” without Tahrir Square, without the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi.

“Success”: Since a General Strike does not make demands, then “success” stops being a finality. Many people wonder whether #Occupy can have a “real” impact. I think it already has. These effects might be subterranean and slightly perceptible, but the undercurrents are there. Plus, it’s already moved the goalpost of public debate, and chipped at the hegemony of “the inevitable.” That’s how we change our political culture and expand the scope of our Moral Economy.

It’s like what Argentine filmmaker, Fernando Birri, once said about “utopia” (as told by Eduardo Galeano). The filmmaker was asked by a student, “What is ‘utopia’ for?”

“I ask myself this question every morning,” Birri began. “Because utopia is like the horizon. You walk two or ten steps forward and it is still two or ten steps further away. Utopia is the same. You walk towards it, but it still gets further away. So what is utopia for? I think it is for this; it is for walking.”

Today, Oakland is walking. Join us!

Posted in #Occupy, City, Dialectics, Elites, Everyday Life, Insurgency/Counterinsurgency, Pirates, Power, Violence | Comments Off on ¡General Strike! Oakland Walks

Against Spectacle? “Crises” and the Infographic

So there’s been a lot of interesting infographics published recently that help visually represent a host of contemporary issue and crises: from Euro Debt, U.S. income inequality, and the increasingly consolidated power of corporations and banks, to the Afghan quagmire and the Pentagon’s gear acquisition and management logistics. A few of these have gotten traffic on listserve I like and through Facebook, but I figured it’d be worth putting them together in a single post.

If Guy Debord was right in highlighting that social relations between people are increasingly mediated by images and representations, then can the infographic be a popular source of demystification? Like “everyday life” is the image both the condition of our alienated existence as well as the possibility of de-alienation and critical political consciousness? Debord claimed, “The spectacle is not a collection of images; it is a social relation between people that is mediated by images.” Can the infographic cut through the cloudy mist and shed some light? Let’s examine. Click on the images for closer-up looks and how we got into this beautiful mess. Continue reading

Posted in #Occupy, Bandits, Critique, Elites, Everyday Life, Guy Debord, Insurgency/Counterinsurgency, Networks, Political Economy, Power, Spectacle, Violence | 2 Comments

The Country and the City

Williams, Raymond. 1973. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

At the end of The Country and the City, Raymond Williams offers the reader an appendix on the origins of the keyword “country.” The word, he writes, “is derived from contra (against, opposite)” (307). Indeed, ideas of the “country” are congenitally related in contrasting relationship to the city. As reference to this contrast grew more frequent in sixteenth century England, the polarization of the ideas behind them became further entrenched. Like any dichotomy, it is misleading but nonetheless powerful. Continue reading

Posted in Agriculture, Boundaries, City, Critique, Land, Marxism, Place | Comments Off on The Country and the City

Violence in Developing Countries

Cramer, Christopher. 2007. Violence in Developing Countries: War, Memory, Progress. Indiana University Press.

Cramer’s book is a strident polemic and methodical critique against widely accepted explanations for contemporary violence. His critique is mainly geared at liberal interpretations of war in which violent conflict is seen as an aberration from the standard operating procedures of modernity. In this view, liberals see violence as an anomaly or outlier both in terms of time (anachronistic) and space (exotic, barbarian). Cramer also disputes the neo-classical economistic explanations of wars as the cumulative result of rational, calculative individual actors trying to maximize utility. He says these two interpretations are conjoined through the popular notion of war and violence as “development in reverse”—a phrase coined by the World Bank. Continue reading

Posted in Frontiers, Historical Materialism, Insurgency/Counterinsurgency, Marxism, Political Economy, Violence | Comments Off on Violence in Developing Countries